#1 is attainable. #1 makes sense. #1 is what I thought I wanted, until #2.
#2 is unattainable. #2 makes no sense. As much as I wanted #2, I could probably never get it. But the possibility that #2 exists, makes me weary. Wouldn't it be wrong to choose #1, when I really want #2? Or am I being unrealistic and idealistic? Am I supposed to take what I can get? I still want #1, I just want #2 more. So by choosing #1, is that settling? Or is that being grounded in reality?
